Property has been named the best investment in the UK over the last ten years, delivering a significantly higher return than alternative options, such as the stock market and savings accounts.
A new study compared the return an investor would have received in each of the four markets, had they invested an initial £50,000 in 2006.
The research revealed that the buy-to-let market has generated a 175% return over the past decade, equating to a profit of £138,936. In comparison, gold has delivered a profit of £50,673, interest on savings accounts is worth £14,447, and a £50,000 investment in the FTSE 100 has yielded just £2,969 over the same period.
Buy-to-let performs significantly better than other investments in terms of an overall return. Research shows a buy-to-let investor in 2006 would be almost £90,000 better off today than somebody who invested in gold, and more than £135,000 up on somebody who bought stocks and shares.
Although property investment can be more time-consuming and hands-on, with such incredible results at the end, it’s certainly worth it.
Although gold, stocks and shares, and savings offer greater liquidity than property, which can take several weeks to buy or sell, this isn’t deterring astute investors, who value the dual benefits of a monthly rental income and capital appreciation over time.
Despite many changes over the last ten years to the housing market and wider economy, buy-to-let is still the clear winner. As well as the most rewarding, it is also the safest of all the investment options over the long-term. We have seen historically that, although cyclical, house prices always rise in the long run. With the acute shortage of housing across the UK, this is only likely to continue.
No comments:
Post a Comment